http://yesandnotyes.com/blog/2008/07/fortunes-40-best-stocks-on-which-to-retire/ Investing, politics, policy, economics, money, law, etc. Thu, 22 Jul 2010 15:08:16 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0 http://yesandnotyes.com/blog/2008/07/fortunes-40-best-stocks-on-which-to-retire/comment-page-1/#comment-264 Doug Sat, 12 Jul 2008 10:39:41 +0000 http://yesandnotyes.com/blog/?p=291#comment-264 You are correct. However, the P/E that Fortune calculated for Pfizer is one that is historically the lowest by all that I can tell. You are correct. However, the P/E that Fortune calculated for Pfizer is one that is historically the lowest by all that I can tell.

]]> http://yesandnotyes.com/blog/2008/07/fortunes-40-best-stocks-on-which-to-retire/comment-page-1/#comment-259 misanthropope Fri, 11 Jul 2008 23:41:23 +0000 http://yesandnotyes.com/blog/?p=291#comment-259 "super-low P/E for such a huge company"? that is a strange statement; it is customary for very large companies to have lower valuation ratios, for the very simple reason that sustained large rates of growth are much harder. “super-low P/E for such a huge company”? that is a strange statement; it is customary for very large companies to have lower valuation ratios, for the very simple reason that sustained large rates of growth are much harder.

]]>