<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Who Wants a Hummer?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://yesandnotyes.com/blog/2008/08/who-wants-a-hummer/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://yesandnotyes.com/blog/2008/08/who-wants-a-hummer/</link>
	<description>Politics, policy, economics, money, law, etc.</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 08 Jan 2009 19:41:37 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Jae Jun</title>
		<link>http://yesandnotyes.com/blog/2008/08/who-wants-a-hummer/#comment-363</link>
		<dc:creator>Jae Jun</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Aug 2008 18:37:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://yesandnotyes.com/blog/?p=370#comment-363</guid>
		<description>As long as GM is able to survive their current lineup and get rid of inventory which is just going down in value as more and more people look to efficient cars, GM could do what Chrysler did back in the 90's (i think). This could be a potentially superb turnaround stock if the fundamentals are strong.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As long as GM is able to survive their current lineup and get rid of inventory which is just going down in value as more and more people look to efficient cars, GM could do what Chrysler did back in the 90&#8217;s (i think). This could be a potentially superb turnaround stock if the fundamentals are strong.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
