Archive for the 'Energy' Category

Inflation or No Inflation?

Mish has listed some good reasons for why there is no cause for inflation fears. If a global slowdown is awaiting us in the future, this of course would mean that commodities and materials would continue their fall in prices.

However, at the moment, its difficult to see what appears to be great opportunities in the energy-related sectors. One stock that I’ve been eying is closed-end fund Tortoise North American Energy Corporation (TYN).

Recently, TYN has been trading at a steep discount to its NAV. For the past couple of weeks TYN has traded at 15-20% discount. I’m fairly certain the large increase of the discount to NAV is due to the large commodities correction: people simply wanted out of TYN. Also, TYN’s price has visited an all-time low and it has a very good distribution rate of 8.14%.

I believe TYN would be a good target for an activist like Bulldog Investors or Western Investment for the simple reason that TYN has traded at a steep discount since its inception in 2005. If an activist investor were to become interested in closing this large discount, I think hedging would be relatively easy.

Turning Electricity Directly Into Sunlight

The New York Times reports on the building of two large solar power plants by California. Of particular interest to me was a new type of photovoltaic technology, which apparently can turn electricity directly into sunlight.

This might be just an editing error. A funny one.

Or maybe I am sorely mistaken about how solar technology works?

Some Current Contrarian Investing and Trading Tips

If you’re a trader, Gold Stock Bull lists three areas where one should probably be able to profit: financials, the dollar, and energy. With energy, Petrobras is the particular stock mentioned right now that seems to be a both a good trading and investing opportunity.

I also agree with the general outlook on energy. Oil was greatly overvalued, but now it seems that there has been an over-correction.  But perhaps not, as I have been hearing that there is some evidence of a greater worldwide economic slowdown, and thus a decrease in demand for energy.

Alleghany Updates Quarterly Holdings Report

Alleghany Corp (Y) last Friday field its 13F-HR, its securities holdings report. There are 13 new holdings, though they are all quite small relative to their entire portfolio. However, I still would like to analyze further some of their new holdings.

What stands out most to me is that eight of these new holdings are related to the energy/oil/gas industries. In general, I think all these new holdings are in some way related to energy or construction. I guess this is not surprising considering the recent decline in oil and the sell-off of all oil- and energy-related companies.

The new holdings are (from largest to smallest investment):

  • CBI - Chicago Bridge & Iron Co
  • GLBL - Global Industries Ltd
  • TRMA - Trico Marine Services Inc
  • PBR - Petroleo Brasileiro
  • KEGS - Key Energy Services Inc
  • EOG - Eog Resources Inc
  • FTK - Flotek Industries Inc
  • MDR - Mcdermott International Inc
  • PXP - Plains Exploration & Production Co
  • STO - Statoilhydro ASA
  • XTO - XTO Energy Inc
  • CCJ - Cameco Corporation
  • NS - Nustar Energy LP

I will most likely look closely at CBI, GLBL, and TRMA. Trico Marine in particular looks appealing since it has fallen quite a bit and its Chairman and CEO recently purchased 10,000 shares.

Rebel Yid’s Random Predictions

Rebel Yid has posted a list of random predictions. I’d like to address each one of them.

McCain will defeat Obama by 6 % points. McCain will be propelled by significant reduction in troop deployments and successes in Iraq. Obama will suffer further setbacks after debates with McCain.

Can an old, conservative white dude beat a young, liberal black guy named Barack Hussein Obama? As the election process progresses, Obama will lose the halo and McCain will prove himself in debate, but I think 6% is far too generous. I think McCain will win by 3% at most.

Oil will be below $100 per barrel in 6 months. High prices will deflate when market absorbs news of new supplies, and financially sound alternatives; particularly improvements in battery technology.

No argument here. The higher oil goes, the faster it will fall.

The mortgage banking debacle will bottom on the news of several consolidations and purchases of regional banks by larger players, one of them being Warren Buffet’s Berkshire Hathaway and its companies.

Yes, there will be a bottom, and yes, the bottoming process will most likely begin with consolidations and purchases by larger players. I wonder if Berkshire will purchase a bank? Wells Fargo? Wachovia? SunTrust?

Food prices will spike on the Midwestern floods, but will recover quicker than the market expects and drops below current costs.

Interest rates will slowly but steadily climb as the dollar recovers strength, oil prices reverse their climb, and speculative premiums disappear in commodities.

If the dollar can find any sort of meaningful strength, oil and commodities will reverse to the downside.

The price of hybrids will fall as production increases to satisfy higher demand and the costs of better battery technologies are spread over the larger consumer base. New delivery systems and business models will also reduce the price of battery driven automobiles.

Democrats will cave on the energy front and support more domestic drilling, more refining capacity and more nuclear power plants. This will happen largely as a result of these energy issues becoming the forefront of the election, and will be seen as a major reason for Obama’s defeat.

I’m not so sure about the price of hybrids falling this year, but perhaps next year. I also agree that Dems will cave on the energy front. A lot of “conservative” Dems were elected two years ago and I think this group is far more amenable to domestic drilling, increasing refinery capacity and even nuclear power.

Global warming will become a dead issue under new evidence and climate trends. It will quietly go away as every other environmental doomsday scenario has.

It’s hard to imagine that global warming will ever go away.

A new model for higher education will start to make current college institutional structures obsolete, as higher tuition costs do not translate into better educations and the college value paradigms collapse.

Foreign language education becomes a booming business.

A new model for higher education will eventually become dominant, but this will be a trend that will be at least three decades in the making. Also, foreign language education will NOT become a booming business any time soon.

Iran unseats Ahmadinejad and adopts a more pro western stance, but still out of pride does not want to reverse its progress on atomic energy. The political change will be viewed as the most successful application of an economic boycott in history.

I’d like to believe this will happen, but it’s hard for me to imagine that the mullahs would have allowed Ahmadinejad to be elected if they did not approve of his views. But when Ahmadinejad is replaced, his successor will be much more moderate in tone.

Interesting Energy Facts

Interesting energy facts via NationMaster.com:

    I recently found NationMaster.com and it provides a wealth of social and economic statistics about the countries of the world, all in a well-designed, uncluttered format.

    The Myth of “Big Oil” as Believed by the Dems

    Throughout the years, many Democrats have complained of the so-called power and influence of “big oil,” the companies like Exxon who apparently have too much power and have gouged consumers by charging too much, especially after hurricanes and powerful weather events. I say this in sarcasm. But still, some politicians have called for taxing profits of these companies and now Obama has hinted that he would use the Strategic Petroleum Reserves to combat increased oil prices.

    OilWith all this in mind, the QandO blog does an excellent job of debunking the myth held by liberals and Democrats that “big oil” wields too much power. Some of the points made is that almost 80% of the oil market is controlled by foreign national oil companies. These are entities like the Saudi Arabian Co., National Iranian Oil Co., and the Iraq National Oil Co.

    Another piece of evidence are the earnings of the oil industry. The oil and natural gas industry falls far behind many other industries in terms of earnings, so why is “big oil” constantly picked on by liberal politicians? Perhaps they’re just easy targets and scapegoats, but nevertheless, the so-called big oil companies wield a VERY insignificant amount of power and influence compared to the oil cartel OPEC and the foreign national oil companies.

    Durable Goods Orders Decreased

    Yesterday I read a long post from Market Ticker detailing some of the recent, distressing economic and business news. Here are some things that stuck out for me.

    First, durable goods orders decreased 5.3% on the month and inventories are rising. Market Ticker says this is always a sign a recession is on the way (or at least evidence that people are cutting back on spending), which makes sense to me. People used to be buying lots of crap, manufacturers ramped up production bit by bit to meet demand. Now that the demand is no longer there because people are limiting their spending, inventories will naturally rise and products will not get shipped.

    Second, he berates the short-sighted politicians for setting America up for an energy crisis. The fools have prohibited any nuclear energy development for the past 30 years. We’ve turned our food into energy and we have refused to drill for oil off our coasts, oil which we know is there.

    Also, and a most interesting and scary prediction that there will be a war between China and Russia in the future:

    Let’s talk geopolitical risk - what’s really driving metals prices. Its not talked about, but it should be. China has north of 1.2 billion people. Russia, which shares a border with China, has 140 million, or about 1/10th of China.

    Russia has a net surplus of both oil and natural gas, and in addition has a surplus of land per-capita. China has a dearth of all three. So long as China can pay for what they need, this is not a serious problem.

    But as we flush, to believe that China can turn to internal consumption and pick up the slack, with a per-capita income of under $2,000, where ours is more than 10 times as high, is pure fantasy.

    I wouldn’t take that bet at any odds.

    What I expect to happen is that China will eventually run out of ability to subsidize, and will turn to what nations have always historically turned to when faced with severe internal pressures and a resource-rich nation sharing a border with them.

    Quite distressing news overall, but good news if you happen to be a bear.