Archive for the 'Politics' Category

Obama Only Got 1 Million More Viewers Than Palin

The Hotline posts some Nielsen numbers from last night’s speech by Sarah Palin:

  • The Sara Palin speech generated 37.2 million viewers, just a 1.1 million viewers short of Barack Obama’s record-breaking speech on Day 4 of the Democratic Convention. The Palin speech was carried on only six networks while the Obama speech was carried on ten (including BET, TV One, Univision and Telemundo).
  • Palin attracted a large female audience (19.5 million women, or 4.9 million more than Day 3 of the Democratic Convention).
  • Ratings for viewers 55+ (25.2) continue to be about ten times higher than for teens (2.2)
  • Day 3 for the GOP attracted more Hispanic viewers (1.4 million) than Day 3 of the Democratic Convention (1.2 million), even though Univision and Telemundo did not carry the speech.

Todd Sullivan thinks that Palin would have easily beat Obama’s numbers had a million people in Louisiana, Mississippi and East Texas not been displaced due to the hurricane. Still, this is an amazing showing for a Vice Presidential nominee compared to a Presidential nominee. Also, I think it’s good proof that lots of people are either excited and/or interested in this Republican nominee.

Palin’s Introduction at the Republican National Convention

Some stream-of-conscious notes on the Wednesday speeches of the Republican National Convention in Minneapolis-Saint Paul.

The governor of Hawaii held up her hand in a symbol for “zero” when saying that neither of the Dem candidates had executive experience and the crowd started to chant “zero, zero, zero.” One of the funniest moments for me.

Romney was pretty aggressive in his speech and used very aggressive metaphors.

I really liked Huckabee’s speech. He was less aggressive compared to Romney, but he had a great anecdote meant to show how we should all be grateful to our military. I know this brought some tears to the eyes of some at the convention.

Next, the Governor of Hawaii, another person who became governor of a state after experience as a mayor, did a great job of talking up Sarah Palin.

Next, Rudy got a great reception. Rudy did a fine job of picking over Obama’s resume and belittling some aspects of it. The best part was his focus on the 130 times Obama votes “Present” while in the House. To Rudy, this indecisiveness was foreign and alien to him. As Rudy said, mayors and governors don’t get to vote “Present” when faced with tough choices or crises. Rudy also got in a bunch of digs against Obama and Biden.

Rudy did a great job. Each speaker I’ve seen thus far has been better than the previous.

Now, Palin.

The crowd loves her.

I think that Palin’s nomination as Vice President is the best thing to happen for the Republican party since the election of Ronald Reagan. Palin’s nomination marks the first time I’ve been excited about the election this year. It also marks the first time I’ve made a donation to a political campaign.

She introduces her family and talks about her life experiences.

She explains what the job of a small-town mayor involves. Paraphrasing, Palin said being a small-town mayor is “kind of like a community organizer, except that you have actual responsibilities.” Palin did a great job. Very well-spoken. The preceding speakers did an awesome job of warming-up the audience for her.

Now McCain makes it up on stage and the crowd goes nuts. It’s just too bad that McCain is an awful speaker. Hopefully McCain wil be able to show his strengths in the coming televised debates.

Financial Crisis Is Absent From Candidates’ Agendas

For the past year, I have been bombarded with a steady stream of dire news and various statistics showing worst declines in decades. Bear Stearns and IndyMac have fallen and several huge financial institutions seem to be teetering, yet Bloomberg reports that neither of the political parties are addressing the current financial crises:

The U.S. is facing the worst financial crisis since the Depression. You would never know that from the Democrats’ platform in Denver or its Republican counterpart, or from listening to Barack Obama or John McCain.

While both candidates have bemoaned the ravages of the subprime crisis, they have yet to spell out steps for tackling it, such as using taxpayer money to shore up banks and housing.

“They fail to come to grips with the biggest danger that is going to hit the next president in his first few months in office: the crisis in the capital markets,” said David Smick, a Washington-based consultant to hedge funds and author of “The World is Curved: Hidden Dangers to the Global Economy.”

The Democrats’ platform, adopted at their Denver convention this week, labels the crisis a “debacle” and promises to jump-start the economy with a $50 billion stimulus package. It says nothing about helping banks or bailing out the mortgage-finance firms Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac.

The draft of the Republicans’ plank, to be adopted next week at their convention in St. Paul, Minnesota, supports “timely and carefully targeted aid to those hurt by the housing crisis” and opposes bailouts of private financial institutions. It doesn’t mention Fannie and Freddie.

The lack of attention to what has happened in the financial world in the past year most likely shows that this is not a winning political issue or that lots of people don’t really know what’s going on in the first place. I think this lack of attention is a serious mistake. Refusing to address and publicize the problems that gave rise to the crises decreases the likelihood that these problems will be solved in the future.

Unreasonably High Expectations: Viewing Obama Like a Growth Stock

Writing for American Thinker, Kyle-Anne Shiver describes how McCain could win the election in a landslide victory. The three important factors are time, the anti-Obama vote, and Obama’s own arrogance.

I myself favor McCain, believing he will win a close election. I follow the Intrade prediction markets very closely and right now Obama is trading at 65.3 and McCain at 31.2, which seems very lop-sided to me. With over 100 days to go until election day, this spread has to narrow. People have very high expectations of Obama, and when he is unable to meet those high expectations whenever he makes a mistake or when he breaks another promise (e.g., recently voting for the FISA bill with immunity to the telecoms intact) his ratings will fall dramatically.

I think of Obama like I would a popular growth stock. When investors are irrationally exuberant with their expectations of companies and prescribe unreasonable growth expectations upon a company, when that company fails to meet those expectations, its stock price falls precipitously. The price of the stock will usually fall until it is in line with its fair value. Perhaps it will fall below fair value. I view Obama the same way. No doubt he’s got a great campaign and talks a good talk and he gets a lot of people fired up, but I will be really surprised if he can hold up this sort of popularity until election day.

Rebel Yid’s Random Predictions

Rebel Yid has posted a list of random predictions. I’d like to address each one of them.

McCain will defeat Obama by 6 % points. McCain will be propelled by significant reduction in troop deployments and successes in Iraq. Obama will suffer further setbacks after debates with McCain.

Can an old, conservative white dude beat a young, liberal black guy named Barack Hussein Obama? As the election process progresses, Obama will lose the halo and McCain will prove himself in debate, but I think 6% is far too generous. I think McCain will win by 3% at most.

Oil will be below $100 per barrel in 6 months. High prices will deflate when market absorbs news of new supplies, and financially sound alternatives; particularly improvements in battery technology.

No argument here. The higher oil goes, the faster it will fall.

The mortgage banking debacle will bottom on the news of several consolidations and purchases of regional banks by larger players, one of them being Warren Buffet’s Berkshire Hathaway and its companies.

Yes, there will be a bottom, and yes, the bottoming process will most likely begin with consolidations and purchases by larger players. I wonder if Berkshire will purchase a bank? Wells Fargo? Wachovia? SunTrust?

Food prices will spike on the Midwestern floods, but will recover quicker than the market expects and drops below current costs.

Interest rates will slowly but steadily climb as the dollar recovers strength, oil prices reverse their climb, and speculative premiums disappear in commodities.

If the dollar can find any sort of meaningful strength, oil and commodities will reverse to the downside.

The price of hybrids will fall as production increases to satisfy higher demand and the costs of better battery technologies are spread over the larger consumer base. New delivery systems and business models will also reduce the price of battery driven automobiles.

Democrats will cave on the energy front and support more domestic drilling, more refining capacity and more nuclear power plants. This will happen largely as a result of these energy issues becoming the forefront of the election, and will be seen as a major reason for Obama’s defeat.

I’m not so sure about the price of hybrids falling this year, but perhaps next year. I also agree that Dems will cave on the energy front. A lot of “conservative” Dems were elected two years ago and I think this group is far more amenable to domestic drilling, increasing refinery capacity and even nuclear power.

Global warming will become a dead issue under new evidence and climate trends. It will quietly go away as every other environmental doomsday scenario has.

It’s hard to imagine that global warming will ever go away.

A new model for higher education will start to make current college institutional structures obsolete, as higher tuition costs do not translate into better educations and the college value paradigms collapse.

Foreign language education becomes a booming business.

A new model for higher education will eventually become dominant, but this will be a trend that will be at least three decades in the making. Also, foreign language education will NOT become a booming business any time soon.

Iran unseats Ahmadinejad and adopts a more pro western stance, but still out of pride does not want to reverse its progress on atomic energy. The political change will be viewed as the most successful application of an economic boycott in history.

I’d like to believe this will happen, but it’s hard for me to imagine that the mullahs would have allowed Ahmadinejad to be elected if they did not approve of his views. But when Ahmadinejad is replaced, his successor will be much more moderate in tone.

Phil Gramm: America Losing Its Competitive Advantage

The WSJ has a good interview up with Phil Gramm. One of the things Gramm talks about is how America is losing its competitive advantage in financial markets. One reason is the increase in government regulation post-Enron and now the sub-prime mess. A second reason is our relatively high corporate tax rates.

Also, Gramm says our advantage over the rest of the world has been our more efficient free-market system:

“Why is America the richest country in the world?” he asks. “It’s not because our people are more brilliant; it’s because we have a better free-market system. Why has Texas created 1.6 million jobs in the last 10 years whereas Michigan has lost 300,000 jobs and Ohio has lost 100,000 jobs? Because governance matters, taxes matter, regulation matters. Our opponents in this campaign are so dogmatic in their goal of having more government because they love the power it brings to them that they’re willing to let it impose costs on the working people that they say they want to help. I am not.”

When picking the President this November, consider very carefully the economic policies of the candidates. These policies will have an impact and could mean the difference between a new era of stagnation or a reinvigoration of our economy.

McCain and Obama Tied

Did I not say that the spread would narrow? After weeks of pollsters showing Obama far ahead of McCain, Gallup says both presidential candidates are tied among registered voters nationwide.

Obama, McCain Tied at 45%

It’s been my experience that the spread eventually narrows as election day closes in. I don’t think this election will be any different. I expect Barack to regain his lead a couple of times, but in the end I think the two will be neck in neck.

RIP: Tim Russert

It has been reported that Tim Russert died of an apparent heart attack. He was definitely one of the greatest interviewers of politicians around. It will be a long time before anyone will achieve the same level of respect and skill.

If this was a heart attack that killed Russert, let this serve as an example of what can happen to you if don’t exerxise, you don’t eat right, or if you don’t treat yourself with medication if you know you have a family history of heart disease. Don’t be a lazy fatass.

The REAL Clinton Concession Speech

Scrappleface received a leaked copy of Hillary’s concession/endorsement speech. It’s some good satire.

“No matter the outcome of the presidential race this November, the year 2008 is a watershed for Democrats. For the first time in the history of either party, a woman selflessly withdrew from a race she was winning to lend a merciful, helping hand to a young African-American in his time of need.”

“We have both broken down barriers, Sen. Obama and I, in this historic race. However, since he is only half black, but I am all woman, it goes without saying that my accomplishment in nearly winning is the greater civil rights triumph, mathematically speaking.”

“I will campaign vigorously for the party’s nominee, whoever that may be. I do it out of a sense of noblesse oblige — my nobility obligates me. I hope Sen. Obama sees my endorsement, and pledge of delegates, as a hand up, not a hand out.”

“If Barack Obama becomes the next president of the United States, let it never be said that he won only because he’s black, but rather that he won because a gracious white woman sacrificed her own ambitions for the good of humanity.”

“In closing, I want to personally address Sen. Obama by paraphrasing President John F. Kennedy, who, coincidentally, was assassinated like his brother Robert was: Sen. Obama, ask not what Hillary Clinton can do for you. Ask what you can do for the woman who was almost the first female president of the United States.”

Clinton Challenges Obama to More Debates

After her recent win in Pennsylvania, Hillary Clinton is challenging Barack Obama to yet another debate before the primaries in Indiana and North Carolina.

“I’m offering Senator Obama the chance to debate me one-on-one, no moderators,” Clinton said this afternoon at a rally at a baseball stadium in South Bend, Indiana. “Just the two of us going for 90 minutes, asking and answering questions. We’ll set whatever rules seem fair.”

Obama is unreceptive, as well he should be. In my experience, it’s the weakest candidate that is the one clamoring for more debates. More debates for Obama mean more opportunities for him to screw and a better opportunity for America to see who he truly is: condescending and one of the most liberal Senators there is.

Yet, despite some missteps, some rather revealing commentary coming from Obama, and despite Hillary’s win, he still has the upper hand and should not take up Hillary’s offer. On the other hand, I would love to see two politicians debate each other without rules and without moderators. This type of debate is sadly lacking from the political scene in America.